<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Coding on GNEWS</title>
    <link>https://news.945688.xyz/tags/coding/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Coding on GNEWS</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:50:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://news.945688.xyz/tags/coding/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Even &#39;cat readme.txt&#39; Is Not Safe: Why AI Coding Agents Turn Plain Text into an Attack Surface</title>
      <link>https://news.945688.xyz/posts/even-cat-readme-is-not-safe/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:50:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://news.945688.xyz/posts/even-cat-readme-is-not-safe/</guid>
      <description>A new wave of security research argues that even reading a local README file may no longer be a harmless action in AI-assisted development environments. The reason is simple: modern coding agents do not just read text—they interpret, plan, and act on it.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
